← All answers

Asset criticality

Is a critical asset the same as an urgent work order?

No. Asset criticality describes the consequence of losing a function; work-order priority considers the specific condition, consequence and time available for a particular job.

What to look for

A highly critical compressor can have a routine inspection scheduled in the normal work plan. A lower-ranked asset may still need an immediate response if its present condition creates a safety hazard. Asset ranking and job priority should inform each other without being interchangeable.

Practical next steps

This distinction prevents a criticality register from turning every task into an emergency and helps planners focus attention where the current exposure is highest.

Two questions, two different decisions

Asset criticality asks: “What could the loss of this function mean for the plant?” Work-order priority asks: “Given the present condition, how soon must this particular work be addressed?” A criticality assessment can remain stable for a period, while the priority of a work order may change as a defect worsens or operating conditions change.

A simple example

Consider a hypothetical essential compressor with a standby unit. A planned label replacement may fit a normal schedule. If the running unit develops a worsening defect while the standby is unavailable, the team may need to reassess the work urgently under site rules. The asset has not necessarily changed; the immediate exposure has.

A clear distinction helps teams avoid both blanket emergency labels and the opposite mistake of ignoring a serious condition on a lower-ranked asset.

Explore the assessment

See how KANE approaches this work and what an engagement includes.

View the related assessment →

Related answer: How do we decide which assets are truly critical?