Why does maintenance schedule compliance remain low?
Low compliance can result from interruptions, schedules that exceed available capacity, work that was not ready or inconsistent measurement.
What to consider
Review the scheduled work and reasons for noncompletion over several periods. Separate true emergency work from work that was added without an agreed priority review. Check whether labor estimates, parts and equipment access were realistic. Define the measure consistently before comparing teams or periods.
Practical steps
- Compare scheduled work with actual available craft capacity, including leave and expected emergent work.
- Record reasons scheduled jobs were displaced or could not start.
- Review whether jobs had materials, information and access when scheduled.
- Agree on a small number of corrective actions and review their effect over time.
A practical example
A crew has 200 available craft hours, but the weekly schedule contains 200 hours of planned work even though emergency work routinely consumes a substantial share. By Tuesday several jobs are displaced. Review four weeks of schedule changes, separating emergencies, unavailable parts, access delays and inaccurate estimates. Then schedule a realistic amount of ready work, record break in reasons and compare the next several weeks using the same definition.
Explore the assessment
See how KANE approaches this work and what an engagement includes.
View the related assessment →Related answer: Explore related guidance